<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Cal Jacobson&#039;s Blog &#187; Wall-E</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.caljacobson.com/tag/wall-e/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.caljacobson.com</link>
	<description>Breathtaking in its unremarkability.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 15 May 2010 08:30:06 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
		<item>
		<title>WALL·E</title>
		<link>http://blog.caljacobson.com/2008/07/09/wall%c2%b7e/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.caljacobson.com/2008/07/09/wall%c2%b7e/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Jul 2008 01:56:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Cal</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Movies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cool stuff]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pixar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wall-E]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.caljacobson.com/?p=59</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As usual, Pixar produced a movie with a decent story -- something that has been increasingly rare in Hollywood over the last 20 years.  WALL·E itself is also a step up from their previous work, though I think more in a technical sense than a storytelling one.  Not only have the animators given a (mostly) voiceless, boxy robot character and emotion, but they appear to have overcome a major issue with CGI: dirt.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The whole family went to see <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wall-E" target="_blank">WALL·E</a> on Sunday and I think we got our money&#8217;s worth.  As usual, <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pixar" target="_blank">Pixar</a> produced a movie with a decent story &#8212; something that has been increasingly rare in Hollywood over the last 20 years.</p>
<p>(Minor <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spoiler_(media)" target="_blank">spoilers</a> follow: consider yourself warned.)</p>
<p>One thing I&#8217;ve really enjoyed about Pixar&#8217;s movies are the <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Short_film" target="_blank">shorts</a> they show beforehand.  I think the one this time around, <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Presto_(film)" target="_blank">Presto</a>, is probably their best to date &#8212; lots of physical comedy in the Loony Tunes vein.</p>
<p>WALL·E itself is also a step up from their previous work, though I think more in a technical sense than a storytelling one.  Not only have the animators given a (mostly) voiceless, boxy robot character and emotion, but they appear to have overcome a major issue with CGI: <em>dirt</em>.</p>
<p>Yes, dirt.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve heard that every Pixar film has at least one major technical challenge: in <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Monsters%2C_Inc." target="_blank">Monsters, Inc.</a> it was hair, in <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Finding_Nemo" target="_blank">Finding Nemo</a> it was water, in <a title="Ratatouille (film)" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ratatouille_%28film%29">Ratatouille</a> it was supposedly food.  If this film had a technical challenge, my money is on dirt &#8212; there was a lot of it and it looked as great as dirt can.</p>
<p>My only criticism of the movie involves the use of live-action footage: some of the 1969 movie version of <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hello%2C_Dolly!_(film)" target="_blank">Hello, Dolly!</a> and some of actor Fred Willard as a company CEO.  Both seemed very out of place in a production by a company that has animated numerous human and dancing characters in the past.  My initial reaction after leaving the theater was that it smacked of simple <em>laziness </em>on the part of Pixar, but now I&#8217;m of the mind that it was just a very poor decision by director <a title="Andrew Stanton" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Andrew_Stanton">Andrew Stanton</a> (who previously directed Finding Nemo).</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve heard that there has been squawking in various circles about a heavy-handed message in the movie, and to be honest when I saw the first trailer eons ago that was my first impression.  But WALL·E is nowhere near the club-you-over-the-head territory that <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Happy_Feet" target="_blank">Happy Feet</a> was, thank God.  The movie may flirt with the boundary between story and propoganda, but it doesn&#8217;t cross it.  I&#8217;m sure some folks will be put off by the notion that the future is populated by fat, materialistic humans&#8230;but <em>I</em> wasn&#8217;t.  I think there&#8217;s some truth there, but the manner in which it is presented is unlikely to cause Junior to renounce worldly goods and embark on a lifetime of communal living.</p>
<p>I strongly recommend going to see the movie if you&#8217;ve enjoyed Pixar&#8217;s previous films.  Now if we could only get them to can the forthcoming <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cars_2" target="_blank">Cars 2</a> in favor of an <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Incredibles" target="_blank">Incredibles</a> sequel.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.caljacobson.com/2008/07/09/wall%c2%b7e/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
