ConnectedText on Ubuntu

If you’re a fan of ConnectedText like I am, you might be interested in knowing that you can get this Windows-only application to run on Linux thanks to WINE.   I found it to be surprisingly simple; as the attached screenshot will attest I have CT 3.0.0.5 running on my Ubuntu 8.04 system.  Here’s how you do it.

• Install WINE.  An overview of what this program is can be found here at Wikipedia, if you’re curious.  Obviously, how you install WINE will vary from system to system, though on Ubuntu (in my opinion one of the most user-friendly Linux distributions out there) you can simply go to “Add/Remove…” under the “Applications” menu item, search for “WINE”, check a box, and click a button.
• Download the ConnectedText installation program from this website and save it somewhere on your system.
• Using a command-line terminal (in Ubuntu this is found at Applications -> Accessories -> terminal), cd (change directory) to the location you saved ConnTextSetup.exe.
• Type wine ConnTextSetup.exe (and hit return/enter) to start the CT installation program under WINE.  Follow the installation instructions as normal.
• With a little luck, the installation will complete without a problem.  You should then be able to start CT via WINE — follow your system-specific directions.  On Ubuntu, this is simply a matter of going to Applications -> Wine->Programs -> ConnectedText -> ConnectedText.

There are some differences, of course.  Some CT plugins, such as Ploticus and Graphviz, do not work (RSS, Tex and Highlight appear to be fine for me, however).  Text on some pages may appear odd — I’ve noticed some minor layout issues involving links.

It’s not perfect but it’ll do in a pinch.

(Minor spoilers follow: consider yourself warned.)

One thing I’ve really enjoyed about Pixar’s movies are the shorts they show beforehand.  I think the one this time around, Presto, is probably their best to date — lots of physical comedy in the Loony Tunes vein.

WALL·E itself is also a step up from their previous work, though I think more in a technical sense than a storytelling one.  Not only have the animators given a (mostly) voiceless, boxy robot character and emotion, but they appear to have overcome a major issue with CGI: dirt.

Yes, dirt.

I’ve heard that every Pixar film has at least one major technical challenge: in Monsters, Inc. it was hair, in Finding Nemo it was water, in Ratatouille it was supposedly food.  If this film had a technical challenge, my money is on dirt — there was a lot of it and it looked as great as dirt can.

My only criticism of the movie involves the use of live-action footage: some of the 1969 movie version of Hello, Dolly! and some of actor Fred Willard as a company CEO.  Both seemed very out of place in a production by a company that has animated numerous human and dancing characters in the past.  My initial reaction after leaving the theater was that it smacked of simple laziness on the part of Pixar, but now I’m of the mind that it was just a very poor decision by director Andrew Stanton (who previously directed Finding Nemo).

I’ve heard that there has been squawking in various circles about a heavy-handed message in the movie, and to be honest when I saw the first trailer eons ago that was my first impression.  But WALL·E is nowhere near the club-you-over-the-head territory that Happy Feet was, thank God.  The movie may flirt with the boundary between story and propoganda, but it doesn’t cross it.  I’m sure some folks will be put off by the notion that the future is populated by fat, materialistic humans…but I wasn’t.  I think there’s some truth there, but the manner in which it is presented is unlikely to cause Junior to renounce worldly goods and embark on a lifetime of communal living.

I strongly recommend going to see the movie if you’ve enjoyed Pixar’s previous films.  Now if we could only get them to can the forthcoming Cars 2 in favor of an Incredibles sequel.

If you haven’t already, go visit Wikipedia; it is the largest and most successful example of a wiki in action.

If you want to set up your own wiki, there are a ton of choices available.  Their features vary, but all should at least permit you to create new pages of information and link them to other pages.   I have two favorites: MediaWiki and ConnectedText.

MediaWiki is the software that powers Wikipedia.  It is free, Open Source, and very robust — Wikipedia has millions of pages of content, thousands of users and billions of hits per day.  Along with full-text search capability, users can upload graphic or audio files and associate them with the appropriate topics.  All changes to pages are tracked, so both vandalism and honest mistakes can be quickly and easily dealt with.  It is, in my opinion, the standard by which all other wikis should be judged.

I’ve written about ConnectedText before.  It differs from MediaWiki in that ConnectedText is a personal wiki — most of the frills of the former but intended for a single, all-powerful user.  Whereas MediaWiki is great for centralizing information for a large number of users (who may or may not contribute further), ConnectedText is ideal for an author or researcher who is unwilling or afraid of making their notes public but enjoys the features of a conventional wiki.  It is a commercial application, however.

ConnectedText’s greatest advantage over MediaWiki is that it can be set up very easily: as a Windows-only application, ConnectedText has a installer that takes care of all the messy details.  Unless you’re comfortable with PHP and MySQL, setting up MediaWiki can be frightening and frustrating experience.

At least, up until now.

About a week ago I stumbled upon this page which takes the user gently through a painless installation process with the end result being a version of MediaWiki that runs on a USB stick with less than 100MB of storage.  The key component here is WOS Portable (Small Edition) by CH Software, which is a self-contained distribution of Apache, PHP, MySQL and a few other useful applications that can run directly from a USB drive without requiring any installation on the hosting system.  In about 15 minutes I had my own version of MediaWiki up and running off of my thumb drive without a hitch.

If you’re joined at the hip to a laptop, this may not be that incredible…but for college students who are dependent upon lab and library computers or anybody who has to shuttle information between their home and work systems, this is hot.  Got USB?  Then you’ve got access to your own data warehouse.  Worried about security?  Install Portable Firefox on your USB drive as well (to ensure local system browsers don’t cache your wiki pages) and use TrueCrypt to lock it all down.  They’re both free, too.

I’ll continue to use ConnectedText — it has quite a few unique features that I like, such as Python and Ruby scripting and the ability to export everything in a self-contained Microsoft Help file.  I’d love for there to be a portable version, but due to prior problems with Chinese hackers stealing his software, Eduardo Mauro (developer of ConnectedText) has had to tie his software to a particular processor ID.  I encourage anybody interested in having a wiki for their personal use to at least give CT a shot if they can afford the $30 (US) fee; Eduardo’s support for his product has been stellar and there are certainly fewer things that can break compared to a MediaWiki + WOS solution.

I’ve found SpamBayes to be incredibly effective so far. I tend to get a lot of spam, and SB is filtering out about 95% of it at this point. The “unsure” messages are usually spam as well. I highly suggest this application for anybody who is getting flooded with Viagra, Rolex and hot stock tip emails.